What is easier because this ...
> If not, it shouldn't be hard to modify cramfs so that it allows
> fs modifications... just stick the updated pages in RAM until
> the file is unlinked or the fs is unmounted.
... will lead into problems accounting available space on the fs,
since openers don't expect that they cannot write to a file
anymore, just because we we are out of RAM for backing the
writes.
I think unionfs will care for this kind of problems once we have
it implemented in an official tree.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag> <<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/