Re: [patch] set kiobuf io_count once, instead of increment

[Stephen C. Tweedie]

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:18:59AM -0800, Robert Read wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:50:54PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> This is true, but it looks like the brw_kiovec allocation failure
> handling is broken already; it's calling __put_unused_buffer_head on
> bhs without waiting for them to complete first.  Also, the err won't
> be returned if the previous batch of bhs finished ok.  It looks like
> brw_kiovec needs some work, but I'm going to need some coffee first...

Right, looks like this happened when somebody was changing the bh
submission mechanism to use submit_bh().  I'll fix it.

--Stephen