Re: Kernel is unstable

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Surely, doing the merge will always have take longer than not doing the merge,
> no matter how finely optimised the algorithm... But merging wouldn't be done
> very often... only on memory allocation calls.

Ehh.. If the merging doesn't actually happen, it's always a loss. We've
just spent CPU cycles on doing something useless. And in my tests, that
was the case a lot more than not.

Also, in the expense of taking a page fault, looking one or two levels
deeper in the AVL tree is pretty much not noticeable. 

Show me numbers for real applications, and I might care. I saw barely
measurable speedups (and more importantly to me - real simplification) by
removing it.

Don't bother arguing with "it might.."

		Linus