Re: fat problem in 2.4.2

Peter Daum (gator@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:25:29 +0100 (MET)


On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > The bug with truncate in the fat filesystem that was present in 2.4.0,
> > and fixed with the 2.4.0-ac12 (or earlier) patch is still in the main
>
> It isnt a bug. The fix in 2.4-ac I've dropped. A program that assumes
> ftruncating a file large will work is broken.

In that case, why was it changed for FAT only? Ext2 will still
happily enlarge a file by truncating it.

If the behavior has to be changed, wouldn't it be better to first
give people a chance to get programs, that rely on the old
behavior fixed, before enforcing the change?

Staroffice (the binary-only version; the new "open source"
version is not yet ready for real-world use) for example
currently doesn't write to FAT filesystems anymore - which is
pretty annoying for people who need it.

Is there somewhere a patch for the current kernel?

Regards,

Peter Daum

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/