Re: [PATCH] a more efficient BUG() macro

[Andi Kleen]

Keith Owens <[e-mail]> writes:
> 
> Would people prefer the C/ASM filename in BUG() messages instead of the
> include header?  If so I will add it to my todo list for the makefile
> rewrite.  Of course you can still use __FILE__ and __LINE_ if you
> really want to report the error against the include file.

I think include file name makes more sense, otherwise you'll have a hard time
to find the actual BUG check. If someone wants more they can decode the oops.

-Andi