Re: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels
Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Sat, 03 Feb 2001 22:38:19 +1100
On 03 Feb 2001 10:09:39 +0000,
Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:
>> This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html
>
>I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when
>building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc
>headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built.
That way everybody builds a different glibc. Does that strike you as a
good idea? glibc should be shipped with standard include files.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/