Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined)

Peter Samuelson (peter@cadcamlab.org)
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:16:02 -0600


[David Ford]
> Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for
> SMP?

Yes. 'make config' should not allow unsupported configurations, at
least where convenient.

So - are any of the other chip types also incompatible with SMP support
(the Winchips, maybe)?

Peter

--- 2.4.1/arch/i386/config.in~ Tue Jan 30 14:46:04 2001
+++ 2.4.1/arch/i386/config.in Wed Jan 31 01:08:00 2001
@@ -154,7 +154,10 @@

bool 'Math emulation' CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
bool 'MTRR (Memory Type Range Register) support' CONFIG_MTRR
-bool 'Symmetric multi-processing support' CONFIG_SMP
+# AMD SMP - not yet
+if [ "$CONFIG_MK6" != "y" -a "$CONFIG_MK7" != "y" ]; then
+ bool 'Symmetric multi-processing support' CONFIG_SMP
+fi
if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" != "y" ]; then
bool 'APIC and IO-APIC support on uniprocessors' CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC
if [ "$CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC" = "y" ]; then
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/