Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?

Daniel Phillips (phillips@innominate.de)
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:05:54 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: mirabilos: "Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN"
Previous message: David Bustos: "Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard"
Maybe in reply to: V Ganesh: "inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Next in thread: V Ganesh: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"

"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> We also maintain the
> per-page buffer lists as caches of the virtual-to-physical mapping to
> avoid redundant bmap()ping.

Could you clarify that one, please?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: mirabilos: "Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN"
Previous message: David Bustos: "Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard"
Maybe in reply to: V Ganesh: "inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Next in thread: V Ganesh: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"