2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN?

Chris Evans (chris@scary.beasts.org)
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:09:09 +0000 (GMT)


Hi,

Looking at the code for sock_no_fcntl() in net/core.c, I cannot specify
"0" as a value for F_SETOWN, unless I'm the superuser. I believe this to
be a bug, it stops de-registering an interest in SIGURG signals. Let me
know if you want a patch.

Cheers
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/