Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks

[Andi Kleen]

On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:23:05PM -0500, Bill Hartner wrote:
> Mike K, wrote :
> 
> >
> > If the above is accurate, then I am wondering what would be a
> > good scheduler benchmark for these low task count situations.
> > I could undo the optimizations in sys_sched_yield() (for testing
> > purposes only!), and run the existing benchmarks.  Can anyone
> > suggest a better solution?
> 
> Hacking sys_sched_yield is one way around it.

How about process pairs that bounce around tokens in pipes ? 

-Andi