Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??

Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 01:42:21 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Lindner: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"

On Sat, Jan 20 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> The idea is to have a char not a block because there is no buffered access
> to the dummy driver. It is very painful to have to open one block device
> and pass parameters to select the one you really want to service in a
> passive mode.

Like the raw devices we have already?

-- 
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Lindner: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"