Re: khttpd beaten by boa

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:22:59 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount"

> > TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
> > beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.
> >
>
> Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?

Tux needs the zero copy patches I believe so zero copy has to precede it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount"