Re: khttpd beaten by boa
H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
12 Jan 2001 02:03:32 -0800
Followup to: <14942.48157.259491.78067@pizda.ninka.net>
By author: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
> > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat
> > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus
> > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion
> > into the main kernel.
>
> My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage.
>
> TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
> beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.
>
Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/