Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?

[mo6]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote:
> > Robert Kaiser wrote:
> > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on
> > > 486 and Pentium Systems.
> > > 
> > > Any ideas/suggestions ?
> > 
> > 
> > is "Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor
> > mode... " the last thing you see before the reset?
> > 
> 
> No, I don't see _any_ messages from the kernel. The last thing I see is
> "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." I have added some
> quick and dirty debug code that writes messages directly to the VGA
> screen buffer. According to that, execution seems to get as far as the
> statement
> 
>         *pte = mk_pte_phys(__pa(vaddr), PAGE_KERNEL);
> 

Changing the 
	if( end && (vaddr >= end))
		break;
just before that snippet of yours (I believe it's on lines 379-380) into
	if (vaddr >= end)
		break;
or alternatively adding
	if (!end)
		break;
between if(end &&...) break; and *pte = mk_...; produces a kernel bootable 
on 386.

With kind regards,

Sven Joos			    
-- 
If the odds are a million to one against something occurring, chances
are 50-50 it will.