Mind trying it with the "HAVE_FXSR" and "HAVE_XMM" macros in 
	linux/include/asm-i386/processor.h
fixed? They _should_ be just
	#define HAVE_FXSR	(cpu_has_fxsr)
	#define HAVE_XMM	(cpu_has_xmm)
instead of testing random bits in CR4 that have different meaning on
different CPU's. 
I'm surprised actually - the same CR4 tests are in newer 2.2.x kernels,
I think. (And in 2.2.x kernels, the above "cpu_has_xxx" do _not_ work
unless FP exception testing etc has been fixed in the 2.2.x tree)
Andrea?
		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/