The benchmark was run against this one:
[root@candle lanforge]# ifconfig --version
net-tools 1.57
ifconfig 1.40 (2000-05-21)
The latest I could find anywhere.... Please tell me the version of a
newer one if it exists.
> > ip by about 2X too. Is that not useful enough? ip seems to be implemented
> > pretty efficient, so if the hash helps it significantly then maybe it
> > can help other efficient programs too. Notice that it is the system
> > (ie kernel) time that stays remarkably flat with the hash + ip graph.
>
> Just does your benchmark represent anything that real users do frequently ?
I'm going to write something that binds to a raw device, which is something
users (DHCP, for sure) does. If it does not show any significant improvement,
then I'll drop the issue untill many-many interfaces are more common.
>
> If you really want to optimize I'm sure there are lots of areas in the kernel
> where your efforts are better spent ;) [just run with a the kernel profiler on
> for a few days on your box and look at all the real hot spots]
I was just trying to smooth VLAN's adoption into the kernel by removing the
one linear-lookup that I know of relating to lots of VLANs. It obviously
isn't horribly important, but it was fun :)
>
> BTW, if you just want to optimize ip link ls speed it would be probably enough
> to keep a one behind cache that just caches the next member after the last
> search.
That is still linear in the kernel...or do you mean cache in the kernel? At any
rate, I'm more concerned about random access.
>
> -Andi
-- Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/