All,
Please reply to daviesrallis@mediaone.net rather than this email account.
Regards,
Dave
------------------------------------
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
>> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
>> always MTU sized skbuffs.
>
>
> One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
> that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
>
> Jeff
>
>
--------------080100040707010804040708
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
All,
Andi Kleen wrote:de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
always MTU sized skbuffs.
One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
Jeff