As you can see, I get little time to attend to maintenance chores on the
de4x5 driver. If there are particular problems that you want sorted out
please let me know and I'll see what I can do.
Regards,
Dave
------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
>> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
>> always MTU sized skbuffs.
>
>
> One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
> that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
>
> Jeff
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/