Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions

Wayne.Brown@altec.com
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:32:39 -0600


Well, I got off linux-kernel while 2.0.3x was still current, and didn't return
until a few months ago. Apparently the definitions have changed over the past
few years.

On another subject, is all this new "testXX-preYY" stuff over now that 2.4.0 is
out, and will we be going back to the standard x.y.z numbering scheme? Or is
this another thing that's changed for good? I really miss being able to apply
all the patches at once with linux/scripts/patchkernel.

Wayne

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> on 01/05/2001 11:15:36 AM

To: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec@Altec
cc: phillips@innominate.de (Daniel Phillips),
hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca (Mark Hahn),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Subject: Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions

> In other words, there's no longer any such thing as a "stable" branch. The
> whole point of having separate production and development branches was to have
> one in which each succeeding patch could be counted upon to be more reliable

By your personal definition of stable 2.0.3x is the current stable kernel.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/