egads! how can there be "development" on a *stable* kernel line?
maybe this is the time to reconsider terminology/policy:
does "stable" mean "bugfixes only"?
or does it mean "development kernel for conservatives"?
me, I've run the "progressive" kernel line on production boxes since ~2.3.36.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/