On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:01:05AM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Stephen,
> Did you respond to hpa on this matter?
Not yet, I'm just catching up on festive-season email. Happy New
Year, all!
> [From the cc address it seems as though you
> work both for transmeta as well as redhat.]
Nope, unless transmeta and red hat have been negotiating behind my
back. :) The misdirected email is probably why I didn't spot this
earlier.
> > but something like this would be more accurate:
> > 162 char Raw block device interface
> > 0 = /dev/rawctl Raw I/O control device
> > 1 = /dev/raw/raw1 First raw I/O device
> > 2 = /dev/raw/raw2 Second raw I/O device
> > ...
> >
> > The raw(8) command supplied in RH 6.2 and 7.0 assumes the
> > latter structure. I have already alerted sct and this
> > change may be coming through in one of his patches.
>
> The latter is actually better, so I certainly don't mind. sct, should I
> change it?
Please do: the current util-linux should be using the new layout.
Cheers,
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/