Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking

Dan Hollis (goemon@anime.net)
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:07:14 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Nicolas Noble: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking"
Previous message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] isdn iprofd hang ttyI1..."
Next in thread: Doug McNaught: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Doug McNaught: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"

On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > without breaking anything. It also reports of such calls by using printk.
> Get real.

Why do you always have to be insulting alex? Sheesh.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nicolas Noble: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking"
Previous message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] isdn iprofd hang ttyI1..."
Next in thread: Doug McNaught: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Doug McNaught: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"