> In message <12542.978456659@redhat.com>, David Woodhouse writes:
> >
> > The IBM DTLA drives aren't in the hpt366 bad_ata66_4 list still.
>
> I second this !
> Until the hpt-problem is solved (if it ever will be)
> we really need the IBM DTLA drives in the bad-list.
> This configuration (IBM DTLA disks on hpt3* controller) can't be
> that unusual ?
So why are the IBM drives picked on? I thought this was a hpt366 problem,
and possibly has only shown up with IBM drives so far.
It sounds like the proper fix would be to not enable ata66 by default.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/