We are in favour of proceeding CD14752 Protocol support for
computational interactions, but have the following comments.

1. Clauses:            1 or 2.2
   Recommendation:     Specify why CORBA 2.1 is used.


2. Clauses:            1
   Recommendation:     Indicate the omission of QoS aspects in the similarr
                       way as in clause 8.1.

3. Clauses:            4
   Problem:            Abbreviation for GIF is missing, GIP is not used.


4. Clauses:            3.3.9 vs. 8.1

   Problem:            Definition in 3.3.9 gives a different impression
                       than the second sentence of clause 8.1.
                       Repetition with slightly different wording rises
                       confusion.

5. Clauses:            11.2.4 note 2
   Problem:            It is unclear what "server-relative" actually means.
                       Do we talk about abstract service or concrete service 
                       providers.