Japanese (or other language) postings

Andrew van der Stock (ajv@greebo.net)
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:05:00 +1000


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BFF0FB.D6E28450
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you can=E2=80=99=EF=BD=94 read the following, your mailer (MUA) is =
broken. End of story.=20

=E3=83=AF=E3=82=BF=E3=82=B7=E3=83=AFAndrew=E3=83=87=E3=82=B9=E3=80=82

With the original poster effectively saying that Linux (and I mean the =
kernel, not just a distro) will not be internationalized due to one or =
two spammers is wrong. International helpers (and generally they are =
volunteers) have posted here before, and we should never cut ourselves =
off from 70% of the world who do not speak English.

ASCII's time is coming to a close, and confusing two issues (spam vs =
ignoring all .jp/double byte mails) is simply wrong (and skirting damn =
close to racism). I'm not going into which MUA is best as I've decided =
what works for me and you'll be a partisan of another choice, and there =
should always be that choice. The real issue is that many MUA's are =
simply and unspeakably difficult wrt HTML (which is how double byte =
people must communicate with any chance of it being read somewhere else) =
and how they handle languages in general. Spam is a different issue, and =
one that must be addressed but separately to languages. This is an =
English language forum, and substationally that should not change, but =
cutting off particular language speakers just to avoid spam or faulty or =
substandard mailers smacks of avoiding the real issue.

What happens if a Hebrew, Hindi or Russian language spammer (or more =
likely, the English-language spammers that I've nearly universally had =
in the 11 years I've had e-mail) mails here on a regular basis? The =
problem of spam is separate to I18N, and should always be considered so. =
Otherwise, lkml will alienate international developers. As Linus speaks =
Finnish as his first language (which requires different characters than =
ASCII* supports in any case) I shouldn't think this being controversial. =
Hopefully, the mono-linguists amongst us will pipe down and let Linux be =
truly universal.
Hyv=C3=A4=C3=A4 p=C3=A4iv=C3=A4=C3=A4,

Andrew van der Stock, ajv@greebo.net http://www.greebo.net
SAGE-AU President http://www.sage-au.org.au=20

* ps remember that ASCII is 7 bits (remember VMS?). Characters above 129 =
are defined by whoever defines the platform. Try getting a Mac and a PC =
to agree where =C3=AB or =C3=B6 appear in this space without specifying =
a particular NLS or using Unicode.

------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BFF0FB.D6E28450
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

If you can=E2=80=99=EF=BD=94 read the following, your = mailer (MUA) is broken.=20 End of story. =

=E3=83=AF=E3=82=BF=E3=82=B7=E3=83=AFAndrew=E3=83=87=E3=82=B9=E3=80= =82

With the original poster effectively saying that Linux = (and I=20 mean the kernel, not just a distro) will not be internationalized due to = one or=20 two spammers is wrong. International helpers (and generally they = are=20 volunteers) have posted here before, and we should never cut ourselves = off from=20 70% of the world who do not speak English.

ASCII's time is coming to a close, and confusing two = issues=20 (spam vs ignoring all .jp/double byte mails) is simply wrong (and = skirting=20 damn close to racism). I'm not going into which MUA is best as I've = decided what=20 works for me and you'll be a partisan of another choice, and there = should always=20 be that choice. The real issue is that many MUA's are simply and = unspeakably=20 difficult wrt HTML (which is how double byte people must communicate = with any=20 chance of it being read somewhere else) and how they handle languages in = general. Spam is a different issue, and one that must be addressed but=20 separately to languages. This is an English language forum, and = substationally=20 that should not change, but cutting off particular language speakers = just to=20 avoid spam or faulty or substandard mailers smacks of avoiding the real=20 issue.

What happens if a Hebrew, Hindi or Russian = language=20 spammer (or more likely, the English-language spammers that I've nearly=20 universally had in the 11 years I've had e-mail) mails here on a regular = basis?=20 The problem of spam is separate to I18N, and should always be considered = so.=20 Otherwise, lkml will alienate international developers. As Linus speaks = Finnish=20 as his first language (which requires different characters than = ASCII*=20 supports in any case) I shouldn't think this being controversial. = Hopefully, the=20 mono-linguists amongst us will pipe down and let Linux be truly = universal.

Hyv=C3=A4=C3=A4 p=C3=A4iv=C3=A4=C3=A4,

Andrew van der Stock, ajv@greebo.net http://www.greebo.net
SAGE-AU=20 President      =20             &= nbsp;     =20 http://www.sage-au.org.au
=

* ps remember that ASCII is 7 bits = (remember VMS?).=20 Characters above 129 are defined by whoever defines the platform. Try = getting a=20 Mac and a PC to agree where =C3=AB or =C3=B6 appear in=20 this space without specifying a particular NLS or using=20 Unicode.

------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BFF0FB.D6E28450-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/