Re: [PATCH] Fix for rtc.c non-atomic mess (try 2)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: fix: umount: device is busy"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"

"You could use spin_lock_irq instead of spin_lock_irqsave"... This means I'm
gonna have to redo it all AGAIN? <snif>

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@web4u.com.br
cesarb@dcc.ufrj.br

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: fix: umount: device is busy"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] f_op->poll() without lock_kernel()"